| Sound off about... George W. Bush and National Defense |
A New Presidential Administration Brings With It A New U.S. Defense Philosophy
January 16, 2001
This Saturday, George W. Bush will be sworn in as the 43rd President of the United States. As in every presidential “changing of the guard”, there will be policy changes, a shifting of priorities and different goals set than the previous administration. One of the major changes Bush plans to implement is giving national defense equal billing with such pressing concerns as education and the economy.
With the current defense budget for the United States at $309 billion, Bush would like to allot at least $20 billion more for research and development. Other priorities include the adoption of new weapons, raising military pay and organizing a national missile defense system - despite opposition from China and Russia, as well as concern by American allies in Europe.
With the cold war now a distant memory, is the U.S. prepared to handle new challenges the 21st century could hold? President-elect Bush doesn't think so. What do you think? How do you think Bush will do with regard to our nation’s defense? What kind of job has President Clinton done during the past eight years? Here are some key points to consider when formulating your opinion:
- On September 1, 2000, President Clinton announced his decision against authorizing a National Missile Defense system. While he agreed that National Missile Defense is needed to secure our nation against all possible threats of terrorism, he concluded that the technology is not ready and deployment would undermine U.S. security. Bush, however, strongly supports such a system and, together with his nominee for defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, intends to make it a priority. What are your thoughts on such a system?
- President-elect Bush plans to earmark 20 percent of the defense budget to future challenges our nation might face. Do you agree with this allotment of the defense budget?
- President Clinton’s defense budget has included the largest increase in military compensation in a generation. According to a February 2000 press release from the U.S. Department of Defense, he requested the highest base pay boost since 1982, 3.7 percent. Yet, according to George W. Bush’s Proposal for a Strong National Defense, the overall gap between civilian and military pay is more than 13%. Is this adequate compensation for our men and women in uniform?
- In 1998, the Air Force missed its reenlistment goals for the first time in almost 2 decades. Is it the responsibility of the President to encourage our young men and women to join the military? If so, did President Clinton do enough, and how effective do you believe Bush would be in this role?
|
|
|
| SOUND OFF |
See what iWon users had to say about George W. Bush and National Defense?
Read iWon users' comments*
* This bulletin board is now read-only
|
|
|